[PD] "get" method for Pd
matju at artengine.ca
Fri Nov 18 19:01:52 CET 2011
Le 2011-11-18 à 10:16:00, Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit :
> This is more like iemguts: properties of abstractions. Jonathan's
> proposal includes that, but also global things. IMHO, iemguts is the
> most Pd-ish because its a library of simple objects rather than a single
> absattr mega-object with attributes (Max/MSP style) or messages via
Is the goal to make pd easier to use for complex problems, or is the goal
to create lots of tiny classes for the sake of ideology ?
I don't mind small classes and I do have problems with certain huge
classes being huge (in Max) and bundling lots of things that they could
outsource, but [absattr-sub] doesn't look like one.
Do you also think that [expr] should be avoided, for the sake of making
simple objects ? [expr] is a complex thing with complex syntax.
| Mathieu BOUCHARD ----- téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 ----- Montréal, QC
More information about the Pd-list