[PD] "get" method for Pd
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Mon Nov 21 12:58:02 CET 2011
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-11-18 19:43, Miller Puckette wrote:
> I'm with Hans -- e.g., 'list' where there's a whole slew of functionalities
> masquerading as a single class (and sharing a help file), but in which
> you only need one object for each type of use, e.g., "list nth".
while i'm all for "one objectclass per functionality", and for
establishing a single idiom (at least, per "objectclass family") - and
thus think i'm with hans also, i still don't see any point in
"masquerading as a single class".
what makes the name [list foo] any better than [listfoo]?
objects with "proper" names - that don't involve "mummmers" - can still
share the same help-patch (if needed).
mfgasdr
IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk7KPMgACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvSmQQCgxxs7OYZFM7jBAz7TU0/77LUN
6dIAn1qZsIDCZb4Z2bq4bMHS3ZNa5kzC
=OXtX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3636 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20111121/68751bb7/attachment.bin>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list