[PD] "get" method for Pd
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Mon Nov 21 22:15:02 CET 2011
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 2011-11-21 22:04, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> Le 2011-11-21 à 21:12:00, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
>> On 2011-11-21 20:56, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
>>> at all, whereas [receives] has
>> after having a look, i see that [receives] is not such a good name as i
>> initially thought.
> Hahaha !
> And don't care about explaining yourself, of course !
it wasn't meant to be offensive (in case you read it like that).
i think that [receives] is a great name for a "multiple receives" object.
however, i think that the "prefix" functionality of [receives] (which is
very present, being the 1st argument) is a bit confusing in this context.
for me, the name [receives] would be great, if you could use it without
having to the prefix (and no, i don't think that using [loadbang]->[foo
bar(" is a proper replacement, nor [recevies, foo bar])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3636 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Pd-list