[PD] [spectrogram~] won't show anything

Hans-Christoph Steiner hans at at.or.at
Mon Dec 12 19:12:02 CET 2011

On Dec 8, 2011, at 7:30 AM, katja wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Caio Barros <caio.barros at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> This bug in [sqrt~] was reported on the list some time ago. It is in
>>> nightly builds of Pd-extended 0.43.1. There is a bug report on the
>>> bugtracker. Consider adding a comment there with the build details.
>>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3442082&group_id=55736&atid=478070
>> Done!
> In the meantime, you could use [pow~] with exponent 0.5. But, while
> I'm typing this and check if it's true, I notice that [pow~]'s
> arguments are swapped again. In 0.42.5 it was finally matching [pow]
> (base at left inlet and exponent at right inlet, so you can also type
> the exponent as init argument) and now it's back again the 'wrong way
> round'. What could be the rationale behind this? In vanilla
> 0.43.1test5 it is 'the right way round', with exponent at the right
> inlet. But in vanilla, [pow~]'s init argument is ignored without
> warning. Two more buglets to be reported and fixed...

Hopefully this should also be fixed now since d_math.c is included again in Pd-extended.  My guess is that it was caused by not having 'vanilla' as a startup lib, therefore it would find pow~ from cyclone first.



Man has survived hitherto because he was too ignorant to know how to realize his wishes.  Now that he can realize them, he must either change them, or perish.    -William Carlos Williams

More information about the Pd-list mailing list