[PD] GEM in 10.7

[IOhannes zmölnig]

On 12/16/2011 12:14 PM, Jaime Oliver wrote:
>> i cannot really imagine why an i386 build fails, unless apple really
>> updated the i386 headers for 10.7 to drop the deprecated functions.
> 
> Well, I know other people are using gem in 10.7 so they must have
> compiled it in some way...

maybe they are simply using the binaries provided?
they are compiled on a 10.5 machine, but they should run on 10.7

do you have any special reason to compile it yourself?

gfmasr
IOhannes

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20111216/49fe7574/attachment.pgp>