[PD] no pd??

[Richie Cyngler]

I don't think you're follow the intention. The intention of using [pd~] in
Max would be to subvert the intentions of the organisers, because their
policy is exclusive for no apparent reason. At least that is my take on it.

On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Mathieu Bouchard <matju at artengine.ca> wrote:

> Le 2012-01-03 à 13:05:00, Jonathan Wilkes a écrit :
>
>  Ha!  I forgot that [pd~] works in Max.
>> That would be _really_ funny if a Pd'er snuck into this like that!
>>
>
> Don't you think that the way the rules are stated, using [pd~] in MAX
> would also be forbidden ?
>
> What's not clear in the following text ?
>
>
>  "The electronic processing must be developed and implemented using
>>>> Max/MSP or Kyma. (we will not accept patches developed in Pure Data or
>>>> SuperCollider)."
>>>>
>>>
>  ______________________________**______________________________**
> __________
> | Mathieu BOUCHARD ----- téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 ----- Montréal, QC
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>


-- 
Richie
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20120104/091db48a/attachment-0001.htm>