[PD] no pd??

[Mathieu Bouchard]

Le 2012-01-04 à 09:55:00, Richie Cyngler a écrit :

> I don't think you're follow the intention. The intention of using [pd~] 
> in Max would be to subvert the intentions of the organisers, because 
> their policy is exclusive for no apparent reason. At least that is my 
> take on it.

I don't think that you're able to read the following sentence :

>>>>> "The electronic processing must be developed and implemented using
>>>>> Max/MSP or Kyma. (we will not accept patches developed in Pure Data 
>>>>> or SuperCollider)."

Using [pd~] requires a pd patch. They will not accept pd patches.

  ______________________________________________________________________
| Mathieu BOUCHARD ----- téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 ----- Montréal, QC