[PD] no pd?? WTF ????

[TAD BISAHA]

The opus could be written with a place for creativity, it depends on the musician.

I agree, the artist keeps the control, theoritically.
What's happening when many artist (a grand majority in fact) cease 
acting this artistic 'nature '?
Must the bulkys (the neo-archaic), to shout to the world that they are 
subjected by an injustice?
They do what they want, but I think that's more interesting to 
incorporate this new data and try to to corrupt it by inside.
Perhaps I'm wrong, we'll see.

Notice in those several verses that France
the only country where we need a license,
when it's time to make a public performance,
just becomes expensive when it's about to dance.

Not only to dance,
and a number too, for every artwork, a code bar.
When this system came, first I refused it.
The "DRAC" (regional cultural administration) said to me:
You act in illegality!
I asked them if (symbolically) they are ready to ask a license to 
Antonin Artaud.
No answer, of course.
I kept this license 3 years and I stopped this administrative joke.
Interessant detail, this license resembles mysteriously a license of 
tobacco or alcohol
seller. Art is toxic, do not misuse!
But this system has a fault (not only one), like any system, I explore 
this fault in all illegality.
What is this fault?
The nature of all artwork, irreproductibility.
No formatted record, no reproduction of the same opus.
Like you said:

The opus could be written with a place for creativity, it depends on the musician.

And I add,  the concept of every opus must exclude any possibility of 
reproduction.
Rock-Art2noise ( a primates artwork)  also answers this requirement
In the facts, these "data" become for me an intriguing dogma and surely 
not an outdated one reactionary attitude.
Each is free to act in its please.
As for the donors of lessons, which they come to work in the "douce France".
We have some interessant dogma for them.
Au plaisir,
Tad




Patrice Colet a écrit :
>> De: "TAD BISAHA" <tadbisaha at gmail.com>
>> Cc: "PD List" <pd-list at iem.at>
>> Envoyé: Lundi 9 Janvier 2012 13:24:22
>>     
>
>   
>> About production and creation,
>> when a musician for exemple play a second time, just a second time,
>> one
>> of his own opus,
>> can one still name the result a creation?
>>     
>
> The opus could be written with a place for creativity, it depends on the musician.
>
>   
>> In France we call that diffusion, but with this spirit,
>> all become production, it's certainly that what they call "the
>> cultural
>> exception".
>>     
>
> Notice in those several verses that France
> the only country where we need a license,
> when it's time to make a public performance,
> just becomes expensive when it's about to dance.
>
>
>
>
>
>