[PD] GUI and DSP

Billy Stiltner billy.stiltner at gmail.com
Mon Feb 13 00:30:48 CET 2012

I don't remember its been about a year or so since I ran it. Was the same
thing that was slow with the other  slow versions of pd I guess.  Next time
Ifire up the machine it's on I'll try to run it.  I remember that max with
juce on windows would drop out with the x.fm patch if I played a bunch of
notes.with a 256b block pd would drop out with polyphony as well but I
could run with a 64b block and GEM slinging polygons all over the place
but  the juce examples were slow. With a lot of overhead. I might not have
had enough memory 1GB.

On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika at yahoo.com> wrote:

> >________________________________
> > From: Billy Stiltner <billy.stiltner at gmail.com>
> >To: Mathieu Bouchard <matju at artengine.ca>
> >Cc: Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika at yahoo.com>; "pd-list at iem.at List" <
> pd-list at iem.at>
> >Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 4:03 AM
> >Subject: Re: [PD] GUI and DSP
> >
> >
> >
> >When I tried JUCE on windows it was slow. pretty but slow. Same with
> pdlork  on linux.
> What was slow with pd-l2ork?
> -Jonathan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20120212/fa5e3b7d/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list