[PD] OT - C++ for reusable dsp lib - or better use C?
Mathieu Bouchard
matju at artengine.ca
Sun Feb 26 19:38:05 CET 2012
Le 2012-02-25 à 17:49:00, Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit :
> I agree that instant feedback is very important, that's a big reason why
> I use Pd. I wonder if he's ever used Pd. Pd has been providing a lot
> of that experience for almost 2 decades now. The one thing in it that
> Pd does not provide is the ability to click on the generated image in
> order to see which code is generating that part of the image. That
> would be a nice feature to have. But I can't see how you would
> generalize beyond drawing pictures.
It can't even generalise to all images. There's an OpenGL feature whether
if you get a mouse position, you can tell the OpenGL engine to find any
geos that contain that (x,y) location while drawing the next frame. I
forgot what the name is and I never used it.
But this can't possibly tell you anything about the construction of Gem
pixes or GridFlow grids, in which solutions range from complicated to
impossible, especially because a lot of objects modify all pixels in the
image at once, but also because even for more localised edits of images,
the objects currently don't track that info and it would take lots of work
to make them do so... or create an image diff tool that would be very
slow.
Most ~-objects also operate on the whole signal.
______________________________________________________________________
| Mathieu BOUCHARD ----- téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 ----- Montréal, QC
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list