[PD] High end, low end (was : some other topic)

[András Murányi]

2012/3/12 Julian Brooks <jbeezez at gmail.com>

> Hi,
>
> I'm actually hoping that there is some mistranslation here (although what
> would Deleuze say about that eh?).
>
> High & Low Art - I thought that was played out a loooong time a g o.
>
> Really unsure where you're coming from Andras and that's with giving you
> the benefit of the doubt (my Hungarian is appalling btw) but you are most
> definitely misquoting me.
>

Hey, I was not quoting you. I was basically replying to Matju's mail which
was basically replying to mine, in which I was trying to explain my idea
about the importance of Pd staying accessible for amateurs, and one of the
expressions I used the describe the "amateurs" was "low-end".
Sorry if I made any confusion, by the time we arrived to "low-end" and
"high-end" I was not having your previous posting on my mind any more.
Clearly, you were talking about something else when I, sort of by-the-way,
said "Pd's editing and programming features shall stay open and continue to
support the less professional and then all will be good." I meant nothing
more, nothing less, and especially nothing personal.


>
> BTW- I never at any point said I have a problem with 'advanced topics'.
> Ever.  Well tbh I prefer the 'here's 3 objects now go and form a laptop
> ensemble' approach to coding but that's nothing to do with Luddism.
>
> As a 'full-time' 'professional' 'artist' who 'works' exlusively with 'Pd'
> as well as doing 'research' in 'academia' I am 'happily' 'high' most of the
> 'time' with occasional cranky but insightful 'low' moments.
>
> Still don't really get your point, sorry.
>
> Julian
>
>
peace,

András
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20120313/91e37369/attachment.htm>