[PD] Array resize : bug?

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

Could you direct us to the fix?

.hc

On Mar 16, 2012, at 7:15 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:

> FWIW this has been fixed in L2Ork but only for the newly created arrays. Opening old patches requires resizing them as they are saved incorrectly in the patch.
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> Ico
> 
> Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A
> Composition, Music Technology
> Director, DISIS Interactive Sound & Intermedia Studio
> Director, L2Ork Linux Laptop Orchestra
> Assistant Director, CCTAD
> Virginia Tech
> Department of Music
> Blacksburg, VA 24061-0240
> (540) 231-6139
> (540) 231-5034 (fax)
> disis.music.vt.edu
> l2ork.music.vt.edu
> ico.bukvic.net
> 
> Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika at yahoo.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> 
> > From: katja <katjavetter at gmail.com>
> > To: pd-list at iem.at
> > Cc: 
> > Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 6:35 PM
> > Subject: Re: [PD] Array resize : bug?
> > 
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Pierre Massat <pimassat at gmail.com> 
> > wrote:
> >>  Hi Katja,
> >> 
> >>  I confirm this behaviour in windows too. So I understand that the actual
> >>  number of samples is the same, the only difference being that they all fit
> >>  within the GOP frame when resized by a message, whereas the last sample is
> >>  out of the frame when the size is set upon creation.
> >> 
> >>  Should I report a bug? Or is there a reason to this?
> > 
> > Oops, seems I responded off-list by accident.
> > 
> > The initial situation with
> the last sample outside the frame is
> > annoying, I guess this could be reported as a bug.
> 
> In 0.43.1-extended-20120201 at least, it is definitely a bug.  When you create an 
> array with, say 10 elements, the last one extends 20 pixels outside of the gop box!
> 
> -Jonathan
> 
> > 
> >> 
> >>  2012/3/16 katja <katjavetter at gmail.com>
> >>> 
> >>>  Hello Pierre,
> >>> 
> >>>  With Pd-extended 0.42.5 for OSX it's similar to your description.
> >>>  However, when resizing to a low size like 10, and manually counting
> >>>  the number of 'sliders', it can be verified that the correct 
> > number of
> >>>  points is visually represented.
> >>> 
> >>>  Katja
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>>  On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Pierre Massat 
> > <pimassat at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>  > Dear list,
> >>>  >
> >>>  > I've just noticed a strange behaviour of arrays in Pd-extended 
> > 0.42.5
> >>>  > running in Win XP.
> >>>  > When I manually create an array and set it's size through its 
> > properties
> >>>  > (right-click, etc.), say, to 44100 samples, the range on the X 
> > axis is 0
> >>>  > to
> >>>  > 44099. Fine.
> >>>  > Now when I resize it by sending it a message ("array1 resize 
> > 44100"),
> >>>  > the X
> >>>  > axis now spans from 0 to 44100 (that is 44101 samples).
> >>>  >
> >>>  > Anybody noticed this in other versions/platforms?
> >>>  >
> >>>  > Cheers,
> >>>  >
> >>>  > Pierre.
> >>>  >
> >>>  >
> 
> >>>  >
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> >>>  > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> >>>  > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> >>>  >
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> >
> 
> > Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> > 
> 
> 
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

"A cellphone to me is just an opportunity to be irritated wherever you are." - Linus Torvalds

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20120316/9aec7b77/attachment.htm>