[PD] [PD-announce] pd 0.43-3 released
jmmmpais at googlemail.com
Mon Jul 9 10:16:12 CEST 2012
yes, now it makes more sense. that could be very sexy, as besides all the
interesting ideas, it would be possible to have a only-graphical version
of Pd running, for people who are only users.
it might not be very practical for cases where canvases have more than a
certain number of scalars (I have some with a couple thousands), but very
nice for other issues.
> When you create an abstraction, you basically save a patch that is a
> for all instances of the abstraction which you will create later. [f
> $1] gets filled
> in with the first arg, [symbol $2] with the second arg, and so on.
> With my idea, you create a scalar that has an associated canvas (similar
> an abstraction), and that canvas has access to the field values for that
> Example: let's say you have [struct foo float y symbol blah canvas bar],
> have a subpatch [pd bar] that is a template for the field "bar" which is
> just a
> canvas. So when you create a scalar foo, that scalar has a y variable--
> which is a
> float; a blah variable-- which is a symbol; and a bar variable-- which
> is a canvas.
> Imagine a hypothetical object inside that scalar's canvas called [getmy
> y], and
> when you bang it you get the y value associated with _this_ scalar. Now
> this inside bar:
> [getmy y]
> [catch~ bus]
> Now if you instantiate 16 scalars, each one of them has an associated
> that gets its pitch from that scalar's y value. In other words, each
> scalar also
> has a canvas that holds within it the means to produce sound from the y
> that you see.
> I'm just assuming here that [getmy] would work like the outlet of
> [struct]-- that is,
> it sends out a message when the y value for that scalar is updated. (Or
> when it is banged.)
> Better yet, imagine using "foo" as the template for another struct as in
> the following:
> [struct container float x float y array z foo]
> Now you can create/destroy voices in an oscbank using [setsize]! Of
> course I'm
> skipping over lots of details, like you'd still have to rebuild the dsp
> graph, and how
> loadbang would or woudn't work when you instantiate a scalar with a
> canvas field,
> etc., etc.
> Hopefully some of that makes sense.
10249 Berlin (Deutschland)
Tel +49 30 42020091 | Mob +49 162 6843570
Studio +49 30 69509190
jmmmpais at googlemail.com | skype: jmmmpjmmmp
More information about the Pd-list