[PD] raspberry-pidi

[Michael Zacherl]

On 19.8.2012, at 12:15 , Pierre Massat wrote:

> OK, it all makes sense, I just thought some list members might get tired of reading 100 messages about the RPi. But yes, it might just as well go back to normal in a few days (though in my case I seriously doubt it :) ).

in fact this can and does happen with any topic!
For instance, I think I'll not have an application for libPD for the time being, but I wouldn't say 'never'.
This happens everywhere and the traffic here is not particularly high, so far.  ;-)
YMMV of course.

> 2012/8/19 <zmoelnig at iem.at>
> 
> Quoting Michael Zacherl <sdiy-mz01 at blauwurf.info>:
> 
> Although I'm subscribed to all Pd-lists I almost missed some interesting discussion on Pd-OT (hey Ed! ).
> I just had a look only because you mentioned that.
> Just out of an impulse I'd like to suggest to close this OT-list and simply follow the netiquette of proper tagging.
> another 2c, Michael.  ;-)
> 
> i was thinking of simply redirecting all mails for pd-ot to "pd-list" with an added "[ot]" prefix.
> but then it didn't seem to be so important and i ended up doing more fun things.
> 
> fgmasdr
> IOhannes


--
nonconform? noiseconform: http://blauwurf.at
http://soundcloud.com/noiseconformist