[PD] creation arg, distinction between 0 and no arg, WAS Re: Splitting Objects

Jonathan Wilkes jancsika at yahoo.com
Wed Sep 26 17:58:22 CEST 2012


Can somebody confirm this?  Because the patch is still "open" on the tracker:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1543850&group_id=55736&atid=478072
 
Thanks,
Jonathan


>________________________________
>From: IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>
>To: pd-list at iem.at 
>Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 4:59 AM
>Subject: Re: [PD] creation arg, distinction between 0 and no arg, WAS Re: Splitting Objects
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On 2012-09-25 22:22, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>> If you use Pd-l2ork there is no need for dirty hacks.
>> 
>> Using...
>> 
>> [list append $@]
>> 
>
>afaik, this is "standard" Pd-extended.
>
>
>fgmadfr
>IOhannes
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
>Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
>iEYEARECAAYFAlBiw/oACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvSUjQCg0SYhlJUmQdAwO6R1h0L80eRJ
>Y6AAoOMippb9RUCbnmcy04urSMPwQ3v/
>=hT8g
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20120926/7007b802/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list