[PD] creation arg, distinction between 0 and no arg, WAS Re: Splitting Objects

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

Please add the crash report to the patch report so that we can track it.

.hc

On 09/26/2012 03:40 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> I mentioned using it in object boxes for getting args, which as
> far as I can tell in Pd-l2ork works fine.  But keep in mind there
> is a crasher bug that can easily manifest itself inside message
> boxes:
> 
> [bang(
> |
> [f 1000]
> |
> [until]
> |
> [list]x[list append foo]
> |
> [$@(
> 
> 
> There was already a discussion about this somewhere on the
> list; it's a known bug in the Pd-l2ork implementation of the
> $@ patch.
> 
> If there's a way to make $@ safely take an arbitrary number of
> args without crashing (like the list family objects) that would be
> ideal, but after inquiring to both matju and Ivica about that it seems
> like it's a difficult task.  (I would have inquired on this list but I
> didn't know or forgot it was in Pd extended 0.43...)
> 
> -Jonathan
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com>
>> To: pd-list at iem.at
>> Cc: 
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2:34 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PD] creation arg, distinction between 0 and no arg, WAS Re:  Splitting Objects
>>
>> On Mit, 2012-09-26 at 08:58 -0700, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>>>  Can somebody confirm this?  Because the patch is still "open" on 
>> the
>>>  tracker:
>>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1543850&group_id=55736&atid=478072
>>
>> If you mean by 'confirm' to test it, yeah, it works in Pd-extended. 
>> I'd
>> love to see it in Pd as well.
>>
>> The situation that this feature is working in one flavor but not in the
>> other is a bit unlucky. Contrary to the GUI enhancements, this really
>> renders patches using this feature incompatible with Pd.
>>
>> Roman
>>
>>
>>
>>>         
>>>          From: IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>
>>>          To: pd-list at iem.at 
>>>          Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 4:59 AM
>>>          Subject: Re: [PD] creation arg, distinction between 0 and no
>>>          arg, WAS Re: Splitting Objects
>>>         
>>>         
>> Using...
> 
>> [list append $@]
> 
>>>>         
> afaik, this is "standard" Pd-extended.
>>>>         
>>>>         
> fgmadfr
> IOhannes
>>>         
>>>         
>>>          _______________________________________________
>>>         Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>>>          UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>>>         http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>>         
>>>         
>>>         
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>  Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>>>  UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>