[PD] i945GM not good enough for GEM anymore?

[IOhannes m zmölnig]

please keep this on list.

On 10/27/2012 08:07 PM, Bastiaan van den Berg wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 7:49 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig<zmoelnig at iem.at>  wrote:
>> what does glewinfo tell you?
>
> http://pastebin.com/SazpiEre

weird, that output looks good enough.

what i don't understand is which glew-version you are actually using:
depending on how Gem is compiled it can use the system's glew or a 
built-in version (which is 1.5.4, which is also what your pastie shows 
but 1.5.4 is rather oldish...)

fgmdar
IOhannes


>
>> what's the problem you are having? (an error message is not a problem by
>> itself; it only tells you that there might be a real problem)
>
> 'hanging' GEM windows, no output being drawn, slow gui response,
> generally not-working-GEM ...
>
> --
> buZz
>