[PD] Licensing issues (was rjdj is gone, robotcowboy is coming ...)
jancsika at yahoo.com
Mon Nov 5 02:48:23 CET 2012
[list of the table names(
| [r midi_note_number]
| [set $1(
If the essence of "seeing the light" regarding Pd Vanilla is that it's more
efficient to use what's already there to read/write/share patches, I don't
see why you'd prefer the abstraction to such a straightforward idiom to
solve your task.
But my main point about Pet Rocks is that there are no operators
for symbols in Pd Vanilla aside from measuring equality.
----- Original Message -----
> From: Frank Barknecht <fbar at footils.org>
> To: pd-list at iem.at
> Sent: Sunday, November 4, 2012 5:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [PD] Licensing issues (was rjdj is gone, robotcowboy is coming ...)
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 07:48:45PM -0700, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>> That's a bit like having an abstraction to make an array of Pet Rocks.
>> What do you use it for?
> Everywhere you need to translate an index number into an arbitrary symbol. For
> example to translate midi note numbers to table-names in a generic sample
> Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
More information about the Pd-list