[PD] Licensing issues (was rjdj is gone, robotcowboy is coming ...)
Jonathan Wilkes
jancsika at yahoo.com
Mon Nov 5 17:26:17 CET 2012
----- Original Message -----
> From: Frank Barknecht <fbar at footils.org>
> To: Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika at yahoo.com>
> Cc: "pd-list at iem.at" <pd-list at iem.at>
> Sent: Monday, November 5, 2012 9:48 AM
> Subject: Re: [PD] Licensing issues (was rjdj is gone, robotcowboy is coming ...)
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 05:48:23PM -0800, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>> [list of the table names(
>> |
>> | [r midi_note_number]
>> | /
>> | [set $1(
>> | /
>> [ (
>> |
>>
>> If the essence of "seeing the light" regarding Pd Vanilla is that
> it's more
>> efficient to use what's already there to read/write/share patches, I
> don't
>> see why you'd prefer the abstraction to such a straightforward idiom to
>> solve your task.
>
> For m_symbolarray the main reason was speed and as a side-effect allowing
> "holes" in the array. Accessing an array (even one in a data
> structure) is a
> lot faster than sending around a long list every time a lookup is needed.
> m_symbolarray made a patch run nicely on an iPhone that was totally
> overloading the device before.
Oops, my ascii art above should have [set, adddollar $1( in it.
How many table names total were there in the patch that was overloading
the device?
-Jonathan
>
> Of course often you just can get away with the usual approach that you outlined
> above, and please do so, if you don't run into problems.
>
> But if a) the number of names (i.e. the list length) gets large or b) you have
> to activate this idiom many, many times, you can hit a wall. And it's quite
> easy to make a) and b) with sample players if you play polyphonic music with
> many instruments in it. Here m_symbolarray is one way out.
>
> Ciao
> --
> Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list