[PD] IBM & PureData
martindupras at gmail.com
Thu Nov 8 00:09:17 CET 2012
Well, for what it's worth, I have emailed IBM very politely and humbly
asking that they reconsider.
The most likely thing is that they are simply unaware, and if they knew
about the PD community and all the work that has been done over 13 years,
they might very well reconsider.
In my letter, I have pointed out among other things that PD was referenced
numerous times in the Computer Music Journal, which is after all a
On 7 November 2012 22:56, Björn Eriksson <miulew at gmail.com> wrote:
> yeah.,.. that really sucks--- i guess they are getting away with PureData
> - instead of Pure Data.... to me it makes some difference - - and apart
> from that and more important - the IBM program will never be as great as
> Pure Data - for sure!
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Charles Henry <czhenry at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm sad. They will ruin the good name of Pure Data.
>> umm... let's hope there's no looming copyright issues over the name. IBM
>> is not *famously* litigious, but they are a computer/software company.
>> Watch out for lawyers
>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Max <abonnements at revolwear.com> wrote:
>>> this new IBM Software will make searching the web for pure data even
>>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list