[PD] ANN: pd-l2ork 20121019 stable candidate now available

[Jonathan Wilkes]

What does the "-u" flag do?  It's not in the older
version I have.


-Jonathan

>________________________________
> From: Ivica Bukvic <ico at vt.edu>
>To: Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika at yahoo.com> 
>Cc: pd-list <pd-list at iem.at>; András Murányi <muranyia at gmail.com> 
>Sent: Friday, November 9, 2012 4:50 PM
>Subject: Re: [PD] ANN: pd-l2ork 20121019 stable candidate now available
> 
>
>cd l2ork_addons/
>./tar_em_up.sh -u
>I wouldn't call it that hard...
>
>On Nov 9, 2012 4:44 PM, "Jonathan Wilkes" <jancsika at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>________________________________
>>> From: András Murányi <muranyia at gmail.com>
>>>To: Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika at yahoo.com>
>>>Cc: Ivica Bukvic <ico at vt.edu>; "pd-list at iem.at" <pd-list at iem.at>
>>>Sent: Friday, November 9, 2012 3:04 PM
>>>Subject: Re: [PD] ANN: pd-l2ork 20121019 stable candidate now available
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Well, my humble suggestion is to extend the bullet to read "Precompiled for Ubuntu 12.04 Precise (may also work on other distributions)."
>>>>
>>>>Change to: probably _won't_ work on Debian and Debian-derived distributions.
>>>>
>>>>It's a problem with 2.14 having been so buggy that Debian Wheezy decided to skip
>>>>over it and go straight to 2.15 (along with many other distros, according to what
>>>>I've read about the issue), but they had a freeze before upgrading to 2.15.  Many
>>>>distros are stuck on 2.13 for the time being, including Debian Squeeze.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-Jonathan
>>>>
>>> 
>>>Aww, just imagine how bad to be stuck with 2.11! :oP
>>>http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libc-bin
>>>Btw, I don't see 2.15 anywhere on Debian:
>>>http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libc-bin
>>
>>
>>That's because it's not available for Debian Squeeze or Wheezy.  It might be
>>on Debian expiremental or whatever they call the one that's pretty much
>>guaranteed to break.  This is why it's such a pain-- you'd have to compile it
>>yourself, and outside of the c compiler I can't think a more complex piece
>>of software to compile manually.
>>
>>-Jonathan
>>
>>
>>>
>>>András
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>