[PD] pd-l2ork 20121112 beta 2 snapshot now available including experimental deb -- please test and provide feedback
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at at.or.at
Wed Nov 14 05:42:35 CET 2012
On 11/13/2012 10:01 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
>> depends on what files are conflicting.
>>
>> ideally however, you should install to /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/, so puredata,
> pd-
>> extended and pd-l2ork can co-exist.
>> but that's for the next release :-)
>
> It is already in a separate folder. Offending files are in /usr/bin, namely
> pdsend and pdreceive that are essentially unchanged but still conflict
> nonetheless.
Why not remove pdsend and pdreceive and use the 'official' packages. I
believe its called puredata-utils. Then the pd-l2ork package can Depend or
Recommend puredata-utils to provide pdsend/pdreceive. This is how its done in
Pd-extended.
This section of SVN should be useful for you:
http://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pure-data/branches/pd-extended/0.43/debian/
.hc
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list