[PD] pd~ & gem

Cyrille Henry ch at chnry.net
Sun Nov 25 19:08:47 CET 2012

Le 25/11/2012 19:53, puredata at 11h11.com a écrit :
> i will not be able to use [pd~], i need a stable audio output no matter what is happening with gem. i know nothing about [pd~] but would it be possible to add an option -nowait or -nosync (making [pd~] independent)?
this is agains pd~ phylosophie.
use 2 pd.

>> moreover, you have to be aware that pd / pd~ communication is inefficient, so cpu is higher using pd/pd~ than using 2 pd.
>> (that the reason of the share_mem lib)
> compiled and tested successfully, but i am wondering if i could use this external instead of netsend/netreceive with 2 instances of pd?


> thx

More information about the Pd-list mailing list