[PD] Max's [rate~] implementation...

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

Why not just use a phasor~ per rate~ and then have the frequency of all them controlled by the same number box?

.hc

On Dec 6, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:

> copy this patch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6P4Ezz9aWa8&feature=plcp
> 
> 
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Simon Iten <itensimon at gmail.com> wrote:
> What are you trying to accomplish?
> 
> On Dec 6, 2012 2:48 PM, "Alexandros Drymonitis" <adrcki at gmail.com> wrote:
> How can one implement Max's [rate~] in Pd? [rate~] takes a signal from a [phasor~] and according to its argument it scales the frequency (roughly speaking). So
> 
> [phasor~ 1]
> |
> [rate~ 1.5]
> 
> will actually give a [phasor~ 1.5]. I thought of [wrap] but that won't do the trick with non-integers.
> Any ideas?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20121206/4f73cc44/attachment.htm>