[PD] Max's [rate~] implementation...
Lorenzo Sutton
lorenzofsutton at gmail.com
Fri Dec 7 10:32:02 CET 2012
On 06/12/12 14:57, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
> copy this patch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6P4Ezz9aWa8&feature=plcp
>
If I may suggest... I would try to observe and _listen_ to what the
patch produces, and then try to re-produce it not necessarily making an
exact copy, but your own personalised version which you think sounds
great :)
Ciao,
Lorenzo.
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Simon Iten <itensimon at gmail.com
> <mailto:itensimon at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> What are you trying to accomplish?
>
> On Dec 6, 2012 2:48 PM, "Alexandros Drymonitis" <adrcki at gmail.com
> <mailto:adrcki at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> How can one implement Max's [rate~] in Pd? [rate~] takes a
> signal from a [phasor~] and according to its argument it
> scales the frequency (roughly speaking). So
>
> [phasor~ 1]
> |
> [rate~ 1.5]
>
> will actually give a [phasor~ 1.5]. I thought of [wrap] but
> that won't do the trick with non-integers.
> Any ideas?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at <mailto:Pd-list at iem.at> mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list