[PD] Max's [rate~] implementation...

Lorenzo Sutton lorenzofsutton at gmail.com
Fri Dec 7 10:32:02 CET 2012


On 06/12/12 14:57, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
> copy this patch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6P4Ezz9aWa8&feature=plcp
>
If I may suggest... I would try to observe and _listen_ to what the 
patch produces, and then try to re-produce it not necessarily making an 
exact copy, but your own personalised version which you think sounds 
great :)

Ciao,
Lorenzo.
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Simon Iten <itensimon at gmail.com 
> <mailto:itensimon at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     What are you trying to accomplish?
>
>     On Dec 6, 2012 2:48 PM, "Alexandros Drymonitis" <adrcki at gmail.com
>     <mailto:adrcki at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>         How can one implement Max's [rate~] in Pd? [rate~] takes a
>         signal from a [phasor~] and according to its argument it
>         scales the frequency (roughly speaking). So
>
>         [phasor~ 1]
>         |
>         [rate~ 1.5]
>
>         will actually give a [phasor~ 1.5]. I thought of [wrap] but
>         that won't do the trick with non-integers.
>         Any ideas?
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Pd-list at iem.at <mailto:Pd-list at iem.at> mailing list
>         UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>         http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list




More information about the Pd-list mailing list