[PD] Dynamic routing for audio signals

[IOhannes zmölnig]

On 01/02/2013 04:24 PM, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
> On 01/01/13 21:46, Mike McGonagle wrote:
>> Ideally, I would think that [throw~] could be extended (into a new
>> object? [mthrow~] for multi-throw?). This object would also allow for
>> these signals to be scaled independently for each destination added.
>
> Multiple [throw~] can sum to corresponding [catch~]
> Multiple [receive~]/[r~] can receive from corresponding [send~]/[s~]
>
> Something like this might work:
>
> | |
> [throw~ a] [throw~ a] ...
>
> [catch~ a]
> |
> [send~ b]
>
> [receive~ b] [receive~ b] ...
> | |
>
> I haven't tested but it might even be fine to use the same name for both.

yes.
we've been using this idiom quite a lot.
[catchsend~ foo] == [catch~ $1]->[send $1]


gfmadsr
IOhannes