[PD] Problem with [link] and [mass]

[Alexandros Drymonitis]

Well, it's full of [trigger]s..


On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:25 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2013-01-08 19:18, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
> > No, that's not the case. I've actually never really touched the
> > example patch. Anyway, my actual worry is why these objects behave
> > the way they do in my patch, which is really strange. In order to
> > see what's wrong I opened earlier versions of the patch I'm working
> > on (which were using [link] and [mass] fine) and they also show the
> > same strange behavior. It looks like a bug hit it all of a
> > sudden.. I've attached an earlier version which is smaller, if
> > anyone's willing to check. Physical modelling is inside [pd
> > object1], [pd object2] etc. inside [pd coordinates1].. It used to
> > be that the first time you hit the bangs, the rectangles wouldn't
> > behave as expected (in the gem window), but after that everything
> > was working pretty stably. Hope someone can help.
> >
>
> i haven't really tried to understand your patch, but you will most
> likely find, that [trigger] will fix most of your problems.
>
> **never ever connect one message outlet to multiple message inlets;
> always use [trigger] in such cases**
>
> fgmasdr
> IOhannes
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlDsZIkACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvSLjACfSdq5S3d5gfewhHix9ZOJhLJ2
> ftEAoLwwKnhAX68HaLw1qItWOW3zl6a6
> =O2gO
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20130108/8f91eeca/attachment.htm>