[PD] enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ?
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at at.or.at
Sat Jan 19 20:22:44 CET 2013
On 01/19/2013 02:14 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at>
>> To: pd-list at iem.at
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 1:33 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PD] enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ?
>>
>>
>> I haven't heard any objections to including them. I agree, they are nice
>> features. It is just a matter of someone doing the work of porting those
>> changes to Pd-extended.
>
> So you would be ok with adding a field to the widgetbehavior struct
> (or whatever its called)? Doesn't that break binary compatability?
>
> I think many of his gui speedups are based off that.
Breaking binary compatibility is not something to do lightly. It creates lot
of other headaches. Plus I don't think its necessary to speed up the GUI, I
think there are better approaches.
.hc
>
> -Jonathan
>
>>
>> .hc
>>
>> On 01/19/2013 12:22 PM, Fero Kiraly wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I like features of pd-l2ork (cpoy&paste raw code, resizeable GUis..)
>>>
>>> iThink it will be nice to 'extend' pd-extended with them.
>>> What do you think ? or is it problematic ?
>>>
>>> fk
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list