[PD] enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ?

IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Tue Jan 22 16:45:40 CET 2013


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2013-01-22 16:30, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
> 
> Pd-l2ork indeed has its own folder (including pd-l2ork-externals in
> home folder and settings file). The conflict is in the /usr/bin/
> folder with binaries that share the same name but not necessarily
> code-base (I think pdsend/pdreceive and something else,
> IIRC--cannot remember off top my head).

since i trust that you haven't done anything to pdsend/pdreceive, i
guess it is save to simple use the debian-package "puredata-utils"
instead of providing your own.
alternatively, you can make your package conflict with
"puredata-utils", in order to avoid the conflict.

the other thing that comes to my mind is obviously "pd" itself.
i guess you are using "pd-l2ork" as binary name, so this wouldn't be a
problem.
(but if indeed you do use "pd" as the binary name, i suggest to switch
to "pd-l2ork" instead and eventually provide an alternative diversion
from pd to pd-l2ork, using the "update-alternatives" mechanism)

fgamsdr
IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlD+tB4ACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvQ6MgCgig47eb9tfYKd4RJV6XZSikdt
n4UAnj+vYGd6RTuzyYsfvp8gyTmMaUeW
=qI1N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Pd-list mailing list