[PD] 1-inlet [list] : bug? WAS: enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ?

[batinste]

Same as Joel here, one-inlet [list].
Happy you found the bug ! I'm eager to test the next build for quantal 64.

On 23/01/2013 05:28, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Ok, I think found the issue, it was a stupid C string mistake on my part,
> here's the commit:
>
> http://pure-data.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=pure-data/pd-extended.git;a=commitdiff;h=7de958b3f4504e9504649944e015e5c13e28df33
>
> Please test tomorrow's build and let me know if it fixes it for you.
>
> .hc
>
> On 01/22/2013 09:58 PM, Joel Matthys wrote:
>> No, I get one inlet on list.
>>
>> Joel
>>
>> On 01/22/2013 07:15 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>> Do you get the right two inlet [list] if you run it like this:
>>>
>>> $ pd-extended -noprefs
>>>
>>> .hc
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>