[PD] ARCH linux pd-extended vs. pd
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Wed Jan 23 18:15:38 CET 2013
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-01-23 18:08, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On 01/23/2013 05:35 AM, Charles Goyard wrote:
>> Fero Kiraly wrote:
>>> What should be changed (,maybe in pd/src/Makefile.am ? ) to
>>> build a pd-ex binary with different name ?
>>>
>>> now it is called 'pd' and it's name conflict when vannila wants
>>> to come...
>>
>> In configure there is : --program-transform-name=PROGRAM run
>> sed PROGRAM on installed program names
>>
>> maybe "pd-extended" ?
>
> I do it much simpler than that, I actually 'mv pd pd-extended' in
> the debian/rules file:
i think that using program-transform-name would also transform the
library paths (e.g. installation to /usr/lib/pd-extended).
that's what is used in the debian packaging of "puredata":
> dh_auto_configure -- --program-transform-name='s/pd$$/puredata/'
vamsf
IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEUEARECAAYFAlEAGq0ACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvRnGgCY/1TG/DQpL2NnmQtpv+Pwsflr
tQCfXVJFPKkPYtE2mh0zFjQWXs00UNM=
=/E5v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list