[PD] weird error when installing pd

Pagano, Patrick pat at digitalworlds.ufl.edu
Tue Jan 29 16:25:12 CET 2013


I installed vanilla from source, but will do this tonight.
I got distracted getting FFADO and my M-audio box working
Thanks for the updates

pp

-----Original Message-----
From: Hans-Christoph Steiner [mailto:hans at at.or.at] 
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 7:54 PM
To: Pagano, Patrick
Cc: pd-list at iem.at; IOhannes m zmölnig
Subject: Re: [PD] weird error when installing pd


Thanks for the report.  Turns out I forgot to add the quantal-i386 package.
Its up there now, please try again:

sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install pd-extended

.hc

On 01/28/2013 07:21 PM, Pagano, Patrick wrote:
> still getting:
> 
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
>   pd-extended
> 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 245 not upgraded.
> Need to get 0 B/30.1 MB of archives.
> After this operation, 74.3 MB of additional disk space will be used.
> (Reading database ... 168184 files and directories currently 
> installed.) Unpacking pd-extended (from .../pd-extended_0.43.1~20120926-1~quantal1_i386.deb) ...
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/pd-extended_0.43.1~20120926-1~quantal1_i386.deb (--unpack):
>  trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/cyclist', which is also in package 
> cyclist 0.1~alpha55-6
> dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) 
> Errors were encountered while processing:
>  
> /var/cache/apt/archives/pd-extended_0.43.1~20120926-1~quantal1_i386.de
> b
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
> 
> 
> after running these
> 
> sudo add-apt-repository "deb http://apt.puredata.info/releases `lsb_release -c | awk '{print $2}'` main"
>  sudo apt-key adv --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-key 
> 9f0fe587374bbe81  sudo apt-key adv --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com 
> --recv-key D63D3D09C39F5EEB  sudo apt-get update  sudo apt-get install 
> pd-extended
> 
> 
> 
> please advise
> 
> pp
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: pd-list-bounces at iem.at [pd-list-bounces at iem.at] on behalf of 
> Pagano, Patrick [pat at digitalworlds.ufl.edu]
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 6:58 PM
> To: Hans-Christoph Steiner
> Cc: pd-list at iem.at; IOhannes m zmölnig
> Subject: Re: [PD] weird error when installing pd
> 
> Thanks I will try again in about 1/2 hour 7:3o EST and report  back 
> Thanks
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Jan 28, 2013, at 5:19 PM, "Hans-Christoph Steiner" <hans at at.or.at> wrote:
> 
>> On 01/28/2013 02:36 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>>> On 01/28/2013 05:43, Pagano, Patrick wrote:
>>>> Installing pd on linux from the website directions i get
>>>>
>>>> Install these packages without verification [y/N]? y (Reading 
>>>> database ... 166579 files and directories currently installed.) 
>>>> Unpacking pd-extended (from
>>>> .../pd-extended_0.43.1~20120926-1~quantal1_i386.deb) ...
>>>> dpkg: error processing
>>>> /var/cache/apt/archives/pd-extended_0.43.1~20120926-1~quantal1_i386
>>>> .deb
>>>> (--unpack):
>>>>  trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/cyclist', which is also in package 
>>>> cyclist
>>>> 0.1~alpha55-6
>>>> dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken 
>>>> pipe) Errors were encountered while processing:
>>>>  
>>>> /var/cache/apt/archives/pd-extended_0.43.1~20120926-1~quantal1_i386
>>>> .deb
>>>> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
>>>
>>> there's an implicit package conflict (both "pd-extended" and 
>>> "cyclist" try to install the same file and you try to install both packages at the same time).
>>> usually, this is handled by marking the two packages to conflict 
>>> with each other (make them mutually exclusive), or rather: mark one 
>>> of the packages conflict with the other.
>>>
>>> it seems that the pdx package does not have such a conflicts line, 
>>> which i guess is a bug.
>>>
>>> in the meantime, you can simply manually remove the "cyclist" 
>>> package and install pdx only after that.
>>
>> I've just uploaded all of the pd-extended 0.43.4 packages to 
>> apt.puredata.info and signed them, so you should be getting an update 
>> and it should no longer have either the "without verification" question or the conflict with 'cyclist'.
>>
>> .hc
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> 



More information about the Pd-list mailing list