[PD] Apply missing

[Ivica Bukvic]

Those are a part of the undo on pd-l2ork, as is changing properties of any
other object, such as canvas and array (unlike pd-extended that in many
cases fails to even acknowledge that the patch has been altered and needs
to be saved, needless to mention add such change to its 1-step undo queue,
e.g. try changing canvas properties and undoing it).

It would be nice if not spreading FUD were added to the mailing list
netiquette...
On Feb 3, 2013 5:07 AM, "Roman Haefeli" <reduzent at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Son, 2013-02-03 at 00:25 -0500, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
> > > >> states.  The first part o that is not hard, the second part is.  But
> > since
> > > >> unlimited undo is working in some parts of pd-l2ork, we at least
> have a
> > > >> working example to draw from.
> > > >
> > > > What do you mean by "in some parts?" Can you give an example of where
> > > it
> > > > does not work?
> > >
> > > Setting a value in the properties of a slider.
> >
> > You are kidding, right? If the value changes in the UI, this should not
> be
> > undoable. Otherwise, having that slider connected to a [metro 1]  and
> random
> > would starve memory within minutes, needless to mention make undo
> completely
> > useless...
>
> I guess Hans is talking about properties like color, sendname etc. The
> rationale is that those might be considered to be part of patch editing
> as opposed to changing slider values which could be considered part of
> patch usage.
>
> Roman
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20130203/c82e20d7/attachment.htm>