[PD] managing freeframe and frei0r plugins WAS: pidip
Pagano, Patrick
pat at digitalworlds.ufl.edu
Thu Feb 7 19:22:24 CET 2013
One should be able to cycle through both freeframe and frei0r plugins without having to call it specifically
Currently in Gem, there is not pix_frei0r, I would love if there was but there are over 100 plugins and there should be a number selector to select which one for example:
[number 1-x]
|
[pix_frei0r]
|
[pix_film]
And the same for pix_freeframe instead of for example
Having to do
[pix_freeframe bloom]
Also one of the nicest features of pidip is the porting of effectTV effects
http://effectv.sourceforge.net/
so again a [pix_effectTV], would be very desirable as well
-----Original Message-----
From: Hans-Christoph Steiner [mailto:hans at at.or.at]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 1:09 PM
To: me.grimm
Cc: Pagano, Patrick; pd-list at iem.at; John Harrison
Subject: managing freeframe and frei0r plugins WAS: pidip
I don't use any of this stuff, but I'm happy help make it easy to use plugins.
I imagine that pix_freeframe and pix_frei0r search the standard Pd path for plugins, or if not, could be made to without too much work.
What are the particular issues there?
.hc
On 02/07/2013 01:02 PM, me.grimm wrote:
> if we take into account:
> pix_freeframe (it would be nice/easy if when initiaized it looked in
> pd's standard path for a "freeframe" folder maybe?) pix_frei0r (same
> deal) glsl effects (i never did quite figure out an easy way to chain
> effects)
>
> but other than effects that could be accomplished with these, what else?
>
> im curious because i have only used pidip a couple of times but have
> always been able to find a way to do what i desired in gem... somehow.
>
> m
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Pagano, Patrick
> <pat at digitalworlds.ufl.edu> wrote:
>> It has a ton of effects that Gem does not have There is not really a
>> comparison. Gem does not compete so to speak because Gem does other
>> things supremely well
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: pd-list-bounces at iem.at [mailto:pd-list-bounces at iem.at] On
>> Behalf Of me.grimm
>> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:08 AM
>> To: Hans-Christoph Steiner
>> Cc: pd-list at iem.at; John Harrison
>> Subject: Re: [PD] pidip
>>
>> i would wonder. what does pidip got that gem does not?
>> and cant those things that it got that gem does not be added to gem via original gpl code?
>> why have more than one vid lib
>> at least in pdx
>>
>> m
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not aware of that. Perhaps you're thinking about how pidip
>>> should all be GPL, since it is based on GPL code. The GPL does not
>>> allow more license restrictions, and the pidip license does just
>>> that. So that means that the GPL code included in pidip is still
>>> GPL, but the code that sevy contributed is under his license, and
>>> those two licenses conflict. So basically, pidip is not legal to
>>> distribute in binary form because of the conflicting licenses within itself.
>>>
>>> Whether you choose to ignore copyright law is your decision. I am
>>> personally fine with people distributing pidip as its own thing and
>>> using it with any of my code as long as:
>>>
>>> 1) the pidip distro is clearly marked as non-free
>>> 2) pidip is not bundled with my GPLed code (i.e. as part of
>>> pd-extended, pd-l2ork, etc.)
>>>
>>> .hc
>>>
>>> On 02/06/2013 11:44 AM, John Harrison wrote:
>>>> I thought there was an earlier version of PiDiP which was and could
>>>> be included with Pd-extended because it was released under an
>>>> acceptable/compatible license?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Just be aware that pidip is not free software because it has
>>>>> clauses in its license that restrict what it can be used for.
>>>>> Including pidip in your package means your package can no longer
>>>>> be legally distributed as binaries since the pidip license terms conflict with the GPL license terms.
>>>>>
>>>>> .hc
>>>>>
>>>>> On 02/06/2013 09:27 AM, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
>>>>>> I just finished cleaning up both pdp and pidip libs to be fully
>>>>> auto-buildable
>>>>>> as part of pd-l2ork (including freenect, artoolkit, opencv, etc.).
>>>>>> There
>>>>> are a
>>>>>> number of packages you need to install from launchpad in order to
>>>>>> get
>>>>> all the
>>>>>> externals to build. Stay tuned for the next release coming soon
>>>>>> with
>>>>> these
>>>>>> enhancements...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>>>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>>>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ____________________
>> m.e.grimm | m.f.a | ed.m.
>> megrimm at gmail.com
>> _________________________________
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list