[PD] Archlinux packages

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

On 02/08/2013 04:14 PM, IOhannes zmölnig wrote:
> On 02/08/2013 07:14 PM, Charles Goyard wrote:
>> Fero Kiraly wrote:
>>> ok. I am preparing the new packages for pd, pdx, pdl and I met some errors.
>>> I have removed pdsend&  pdreceive also with man pages from pdx.
>>>
>>> When installing pd vanilla I ve encounter conflicting files:
>>> puredata: /usr/bin/pd-gui.tcl exists in filesystem
>>> puredata: /usr/include/m_pd.h exists in filesystem
>>> puredata: /usr/include/pa_jack.h exists in filesystem
>>> puredata: /usr/include/pa_linux_alsa.h exists in filesystem
>>> puredata: /usr/include/portaudio.h exists in filesystem
>>> puredata: /usr/lib/libportaudio.a exists in filesystem
>>> puredata: /usr/lib/libportaudio.so exists in filesystem
>>> puredata: /usr/lib/libportaudio.so.2 exists in filesystem
>>> puredata: /usr/lib/libportaudio.so.2.0.0 exists in filesystem
> 
> 
> portaudio files (libportaudio*, pa_*) should definitely _not_ be installed by
> any pd package.
> you should try to use your system's portaudio, rather than the one Pd comes with.
> 
> as for Pd's include file(s):
> install to /usr/include/<pdflavour>/
> /usr/include/m_pd.h may (probably should) be kept for compat reasons, and i
> think that it should belong to pd-vanilla.
> (but then: afaik m_pd.h from pd-vanilla and pd-extended don't differ in any
> practical sense; with pd-l2ork this might be different)

/usr/include/m_pd.h should definitely stay and definitely be from pd-vanilla.
Pd-extended's has some differences, including the version macros i.e. TEST
version.

.hc