[PD] [GEM] pix_write numbering

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> 2013/3/19 Fero Kiraly <fero.kiraly at gmail.com>
>> 
>> why is pix_write numbering files like this ? : 00000 00001 00002 
>> ... 00253 ...

because it makes it easier to sort files alphabetically.

>> 
>> and pix_multiimage is supposed to read files with 'clear'
>> numbering
like
>> this: 0 1 2 .. 256

because it's borked (for compatibility reasons)

On 2013-03-19 14:34, Antoine Villeret wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I totally agree with you Fero, I experienced the same difficulty to
> use images written with pix_write in pix_multiimage. I made a
> script to rename the files. But it could good to have an option
> like 'pix_write_naming_style' in pix_multiimage which can make both
> working together, isn't it ?

as a matter of fact, i think [pix_multiimage] is deprecated, and you
should use an abstraction wrapper using [pix_buffer] and
[makefilename] instead.
thus, you can choose the naming scheme you like.

similarily, [pix_write] can easily build as an abstraction using
[pix_buffer] and [makefilename], so you can choose the naming scheme
you like. Gem already comes with an abstraction implementation of
[pix_write] (though it's currently overwritten by the Gem built-in of
the same name and functionality)

fgamdsr
IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlFItZ0ACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvQDNQCaAuByMQWxxGhnqwgPhztNgtQh
wfwAoLYxGGNxn4nKRFEE8VCHCVS1hagI
=279m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----