[PD] some issues with dynamic patching

[Alexandros Drymonitis]

Concerning [loadbang] you should use [initbang] instead AFAIK. But that's
not vanilla.
Concerning the error, it might happen cause Pd is not built for dynamic
patching (even though some of us love it..), so you might be getting errors
that have no impact on your process, never mind them. There could be a way
to avoid this but I'm ignorant of it..
Give Enrique Erne's pd-dom a try, it's a great wrapper of Pd' dynamic
patching capabilities.


On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Jeppi Jeppi <jeppiot at hotmail.com> wrote:

>  Hi all,
> just two questions regarding Pd's messaging system.
> -When I suppres an object by using a find & cut set of messages to pd, I
> get a "consistency check" error. It is properly erased and nothing wrong
> seems to happen but, could this error be avoided? Could it be eventually
> dangerous?
>
> -When I instantiate dynamically an abstraction (not a pd native object,
> but an abstraction), it does not receive a proper loadbang message. And I
> should have a way to initialize dynamically created abstractions, taking
> into account that I instantiate several of them and initialization should
> be performed indiviually.
>
> Any hints welcome!
> Josep M
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20130323/6f6111da/attachment.htm>