[PD] some issues with dynamic patching
Jonathan Wilkes
jancsika at yahoo.com
Sun Mar 24 18:40:11 CET 2013
----- Original Message -----
> From: Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com>
> To: pd-list at iem.at
> Cc:
> Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 7:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [PD] some issues with dynamic patching
>
> On Sam, 2013-03-23 at 15:39 +0200, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
>> Concerning [loadbang] you should use [initbang] instead AFAIK. But
>> that's not vanilla.
>
> There are two separate issues to be considered:
>
> [initbang] should be used when you dynamically create xlets within an
> abstraction, so that those are created before the connections of the
> parent are drawn.
>
> I think what OP means is that [loadbang]s in dynamically created
> abstractions do not fire too late, but not at all. Whether this is a
> feature or a bug is not clear to me, but it is the current behavior
> which has been discussed many times on this list. To me this behavior
> actually makes sense. It allows you to first create many instances of
> the abstraction dynamically and only then let them loadbang by sending a
> 'loadbang' message to their canvasses.
And in most instances it's much easier to just use [initbang] to initialize
the abstraction in the way the user expects it to happen. Unless the
abstraction initialization is sending a message to an outlet there is no need to
manually send loadbangs. [initbang] will do the right thing here.
-Jonathan
>
> Roman
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list