[PD] [PD-dev] Rewriting a unified phasor / metro object for reading tables

katja katjavetter at gmail.com
Thu May 9 11:12:40 CEST 2013

On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Ed Kelly <morph_2016 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> ...
> Does phasor~ always start from 0 and go to 1, i.e. is there always a signal value of 0 at the start of the ramp and a signal value of 1 at the end? As I write this, my common sense tells me it should be "yes" but I want to make sure. I suppose I should just try it really...
> ...

A [phasor~] ramp should start with the remainder after wrapping, which
is non-zero in most cases.

For pd-double I had to rewrite [phasor~], and it turned out that an
implementation with branching is more efficient on current Intel
processors. ARM processors do branch predication, it could be
efficient as well. You could try the code from here and put message
triggers in the branches:



More information about the Pd-list mailing list