Wed May 8 10:53:36 CEST 2013
And for what I am trying, editing data manually/per GUI is quite easy.
But how to set data programmatically, i.e. by message? As you can only
change a certain scalar by setting a pointer to it, the only way I see
is to traverse all scalars until you find the one you want to change. Is
this currently the only way to change a property of a particular scalar?
On Sam, 2013-05-25 at 12:13 +0200, JoÃ£o Pais wrote:
> jonathan already gave a smart reply to your question, using variable
> variables as delimiters in your polygons, you can vary everything. If you
> notice, in your first example you could vary the position of the
> individual array elements (because you don't have a fixed x distance), but
> you couldn't vary the position of the whole array - which wasn't necessary
> for now, but I just wanted to remark that.
> I would add only something to your [setsize bar_struct bar_array]
> construct: in case you want to get a pointer of a specific template, use
> the template's name as argument e.g. [pointer bar_struct], and route the
> exit of the 2nd outlet to a [next(. That creates a loop that only stops
> when you get your pointer. if you have several scalars of the same
> template, adding a [get ...] to that loop makes it better (in case you
> have a sort of identifier for each scalar).
> A not-so-efficient-as-Jonathan's example of dynamic polygons can be seen
> in my [jmmmp/bezier] abstraction (attached also the upcoming audio
> version). Inside my folder are a couple other abstractions using data
> structures (some new ones might appear only in the next pd-ext release).
> I wouldn't say "don't bother with data structures", but rather "work a lot
> with it and make pressure so that they get improved". besides Jonathan's
> remarks, there are many other simple things that make life harder: lack of
> methods for simple operations (select previous pointer, or previous/next X
> pointers), math or expr functions inside of data-s templates (you need to
> get the data and then set it again), can't delete scalars without using
> the delete key or clearing the whole canvas, ...
> many small things that make one patch a lot just to make simple operations.
> and the biggest problem, rendering. don't even try to think of using
> data-s for any high-rate GUI. for that better to look at GEM.
> looking at Miller's words, data structures was one of the main reasons to
> start Pd. after all this time, they didn't change that much.
> very nice would be to have Ircam's FTM library implemented in Pd, but it
> seems to be an impossible task, someone has tried already.
> > On Fre, 2013-05-24 at 16:13 -0700, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> >> Here's a quickly made approach that uses quanta syntax and checks
> >> for mouse manipulations from the outlet of [struct].
> > Thanks a lot. A lot of new stuff (for me) in your example.
> >> I wouldn't recommend spending too much time learning data structures.
> >> They are _extremely_ limited with the current implementation.
> > I appreciate your advice. I have the impression one finds out about the
> > limitations only by diving into data structures a bit more deeply.
> > Although I haven't a clear picture yet what is possible and what is not,
> > I find some of the examples in Millers documentation quite intriguing.
> > Roman
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com>
> >> To: pd-list <pd-list at iem.at>
> >> Cc:
> >> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 6:15 PM
> >> Subject: [PD] first exercise with data structures
> >> Hi all
> >> Finally an attempt to dive into data structures. I read Frank
> >> Barknecht's still excellent DS tutorial and, of course, section 4 of
> >> Pd's help written by Miller Puckette, which is a bit more demanding, but
> >> definitely very interesting. Though I can somewhat follow the simpler
> >> example patches, the fundamental concepts are still a bit nebulous.
> >> Here's my problem. I found how to use [filledpolygon] to draw a
> >> rectangle whose width can be changed by mouse interaction. When using
> >> the same [struct] as the element of an array, I can draw many rectangles
> >> which can be grabbed and moved by the mouse (x-y-array). However, when
> >> it is used as an element, the ability to change the width dynamically
> >> with the mouse is lost. When it is not part of an array, it cannot be
> >> moved easily (without going into edit mode). How can I have both at the
> >> same time? Is it even possible at all?
> >> Attached is an example that illustrates both cases.
> >> Roman
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
More information about the Pd-list