[PD] CPU 100% after suspend (was Re: closed window not destroyed? (in l2ork))
muranyia at gmail.com
Fri Jul 5 12:42:59 CEST 2013
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 12:08 PM, András Murányi <muranyia at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 22:58 +0200, András Murányi wrote:
>> > Hi List,
>> > I've got used to putting my PC to sleep (aka hibernation) often
>> > lately. Now there is this behaviour of Pd that when you leave a patch
>> > open and put the computer to sleep, once it wakes up Pd will try to do
>> > everything it missed while the computer was sleeping, so the CPU goes
>> > 100% for quite a while. I suppose this is by design.
>> > What I've just noticed using l2ork is that I had closed my patch
>> > before hibernating (in order to avoid the CPU boost when waking up),
>> > put the computer to sleep for a few hours, and when i woke it up,
>> > surprisingly the 100% CPU boost still happened - with only the main
>> > window and console open.
>> > This makes me think some things are not destroyed properly when a
>> > patch is closed.
>> > Any thoughts appreciated...
> I've tested it out a bit, and IOhannes and Ivica are right: it's a cleanup
> problem, rather something else. (It happens also when there is and there
> was no patch open).
i mean NOT a cleanup problem
>> Does it help to toggle DSP off and on, when Pd is in this post-suspend
>> mode? I had the impression it did, but I wasn't sure if it was just a
>> coincident, that CPU usage stopped at the same moment.
> Yes! I was actually toggling DSP on and off, because I usually keep it
> off. When I switched it on, CPU usage instantly dropped to normal.
> Seems like a symptom that is avoidable...
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list