[PD] routeOSC - dynamic routing?

[Dan Wilcox]

Ah, that's much simpler than what I was thinking. How do you always do it Roman? :D

On Aug 7, 2013, at 9:44 AM, pd-list-request at iem.at wrote:

> From: Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [PD] routeOSC - dynamic routing?
> Date: August 7, 2013 7:16:13 AM EDT
> To: pd-list at iem.at
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 02:15 -0400, puredata at 11h11.com wrote:
>> hi all,
>> 
>> i have more than 50 OSC messages to [routeOSC], i would like to avoid  
>> having to cut and paste & click and drag. what are my options here?
>> 
>> [routeOSC /knob1 /knob2 ...]
>> |              |
>> [s $0-knob1]   [s $0-knob2]
>> 
>> thanks
> 
> Instead of routing with [routeOSC], you could use the last address field
> directly as the send address:
> 
> [/knobs/knob1 23(
> |
> [routeOSC /knobs/
> |
> [list]
> |
> [; $1 $2(
> 
> As an alternative to the ;-messagebox with hard-coded number of
> elements, you could employ a settable [send]
> 
> Roman

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika
danomatika.com
robotcowboy.com





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20130807/d36f1da4/attachment.htm>