[PD] abstraction penalty benchmarks

[Miller Puckette]

Or... just limit the number of canvases that can bind themselves to a single
symbol to a reasonable number (5 or so, settable by flag for back-compatibility
if anyone cares).

cheers
M

On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 07:51:30PM +0100, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
> On 09/08/13 19:42, Miller Puckette wrote:
> > There still could be situations where an abstraction has a sub-patch ("pd foo"
> > for instance) - I'm not clear as to whether those namings should be supressed
> > as well.  It seems like a tricky problem - lots of people seem to use
> > abstractions with only one instance and might be depending on the bindings.
> 
> Maybe the best fix would be to make pd_unbind() constant time (perhaps
> by storing bindings in a doubly-linked list instead of a singly-linked
> list) and be done with it, instead of hacking workarounds..
> 
> 
> Claude
> -- 
> http://mathr.co.uk
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list