[PD] [PD-announce] pd 0.45 test release

Miller Puckette msp at ucsd.edu
Sun Aug 18 21:12:05 CEST 2013


right you are... fixed.  

chanks
M
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 12:08:36PM +0200, Jack wrote:
> Le 18/08/2013 03:51, Miller Puckette a écrit :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Pd 0.45-0test1 is now up on http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/software.htm
> > or via git from sourceforge:
> >   git clone git://pure-data.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/pure-data/pure-data
> >   git checkout 0.45-0test1
> >
> >
> > Some new features:
> >
> > binary netsend/netreceive (so you should no longer need an extern for OSC)
> >
> > pd~ (multiprocessing) works on windows and is less likely to deadlock although
> > not yet perfect
> >
> > multi-purpose "array" and "text" objects.  "Array" is a more general
> > replacement for the "table", "tabread" and "tabwrite" obejcts.  "text" is
> > sort of like Max's "coll" but simpler and hopefully more powerful.
> >
> > "text"s are also avaioable as fields in data structures.
> >
> > "tempo" messages for delay, metro, timer, and "test sequence".  In particular
> > you can specify or measure time in samples, but you can also use this for
> > changing the speed of an ensemble of delay loops while keeping them in sync.
> >
> > Objects/messages/comments have settable box widths.  
> >
> > Also various improvements in audio and midi handling:
> >
> > The Pd window now tells you whether PD has an audio device open or not
> >
> > Fixed hangups exiting when using jack
> >
> > Got ASIO working again on PC (it was apparently broken; I don't know for how
> > long.)
> >
> > cheers
> > Miller
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pd-announce mailing list
> > Pd-announce at iem.at
> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-announce
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> 
> Re-hello Miller,
> 
> In your help patch about [delay], when you write about 'tempo' :
> "In this example the unit is set to 1/2 millisecond so that '1000' gives
> a delay of 2000 msec (2 seconds)."
> This should give a 500 ms instead 2000 ms, or i am wrong ?
> ++
> 
> Jack
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list



More information about the Pd-list mailing list