[PD] [PD-announce] Pd version 0.25-0 test 2 released

[Miller Puckette]

That's a bug fix :)

To get the buggy (have-to-multiply-by-the-upsampling-multiple) behavior
back, send a message "; pd compatibility 0.43"

I need to make this very clear in the documnetation; and I now think the
compatiibillity level should have been set to "0.44" instead - I'll fix that.

cheers
Miller

On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:13:35PM +0200, martin brinkmann wrote:
> On 08/19/2013 08:11 AM, Miller Puckette wrote:
> > Hi all -
> > 
> >  I've now put out test 2
> 
> there seems to be a new behaviour concerning tabread4~ and upsampling:
> (compared to 044, i have not checked the 1st 045 version)
> 
> in 044 the frequency of the phasor reading the table had to be
> multiplied by the upsampling factor, to get the right output frequency.
> in 045 the output frequency of such oscillators much higher.
> this seems to happen only with tabread(4)~, the example in
> 'j07 oversampling' works as expected, but many of my bass-synth-patches
> sound a little squeaky now. ;)
> 
> i have attached an example with tabread4~.

> #N canvas 130 266 876 628 10;
> #X obj 562 67 until;
> #X obj 562 95 f;
> #X obj 593 97 + 1;
> #X obj 557 154 t f f;
> #X obj 564 13 loadbang;
> #X obj 594 118 mod 515;
> #X msg 564 40 515;
> #X obj 529 633 table \$0triwave 515;
> #X obj 419 268 mod 512;
> #X obj 474 545 tabwrite \$0triwave;
> #X obj 513 354 * 2;
> #X obj 510 380 - 1;
> #X obj 433 406 *;
> #X obj 420 295 t f f;
> #X obj 431 432 / 512;
> #X obj 507 331 < 256;
> #X obj 455 458 -;
> #X obj 474 483 * 4;
> #X obj 473 516 + 3;
> #X obj 445 222 + 128;
> #X text 475 16 make tri wave;
> #X obj 78 462 dac~;
> #X obj 57 418 *~;
> #N canvas 316 285 1183 715 triosctest 0;
> #X obj 31 100 phasor~;
> #X obj 41 74 inlet~;
> #X obj 45 434 outlet~;
> #X text 88 75 freq;
> #X obj 49 183 tabread4~ \$0triwave;
> #X obj 50 329 *~ 0.125;
> #X obj 50 352 rzero~ -1;
> #X obj 50 375 rzero~ -1;
> #X obj 50 398 rzero~ -1;
> #X obj 49 203 *~ 0.2368;
> #X obj 50 249 *~ 0.06261;
> #X obj 49 226 rpole~ 0.76319;
> #X obj 49 272 cpole~ 0.85223 0.20194;
> #X obj 48 300 cpole~ 0.85223 -0.2019;
> #X text 150 347 filter from pd doc j07.oversampling (modified for 8
> times oversampling);
> #X obj 50 148 *~ 512;
> #X obj 166 83 block~ 64 1 8;
> #X text 95 433 filtered tabread;
> #X connect 0 0 15 0;
> #X connect 1 0 0 0;
> #X connect 4 0 9 0;
> #X connect 5 0 6 0;
> #X connect 6 0 7 0;
> #X connect 7 0 8 0;
> #X connect 8 0 2 0;
> #X connect 9 0 11 0;
> #X connect 10 0 12 0;
> #X connect 11 0 10 0;
> #X connect 12 0 13 0;
> #X connect 12 1 13 1;
> #X connect 13 0 5 0;
> #X connect 15 0 4 0;
> #X restore 5 261 pd triosctest;
> #X obj 101 369 hsl 128 15 0 1 0 1 empty empty empty -2 -8 0 10 -262144
> -1 -1 1400 1;
> #X obj -8 155 nbx 5 14 -1e+37 1e+37 0 1 empty empty empty 0 -8 0 10
> -262144 -1 -1 100 256;
> #X text 101 348 tabread osc;
> #X obj -5 209 * 8;
> #X text 45 180 in 44.1 this ensures the correct frequency with 8 times
> oversampling. in 045.test2 the frequency is much higher;
> #X connect 0 0 1 0;
> #X connect 1 0 2 0;
> #X connect 1 0 3 0;
> #X connect 2 0 5 0;
> #X connect 3 0 19 0;
> #X connect 3 1 9 1;
> #X connect 4 0 6 0;
> #X connect 5 0 1 1;
> #X connect 6 0 0 0;
> #X connect 8 0 13 0;
> #X connect 10 0 11 0;
> #X connect 11 0 12 1;
> #X connect 12 0 14 0;
> #X connect 13 0 12 0;
> #X connect 13 1 15 0;
> #X connect 14 0 16 0;
> #X connect 15 0 10 0;
> #X connect 15 0 16 1;
> #X connect 16 0 17 0;
> #X connect 17 0 18 0;
> #X connect 18 0 9 0;
> #X connect 19 0 8 0;
> #X connect 22 0 21 0;
> #X connect 22 0 21 1;
> #X connect 23 0 22 0;
> #X connect 24 0 22 1;
> #X connect 25 0 27 0;
> #X connect 27 0 23 0;

> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list