[PD] Upcoming pd-l2ork release teaser

Simon Wise simonzwise at gmail.com
Wed Aug 28 05:36:34 CEST 2013


On 28/08/13 04:34, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> On 08/27/2013 12:56 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>> On 08/27/13 18:20, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
>>> to share a small but hopefully sweet teaser screenshot with everyone :-)
>> while it does look pretty, i hope you are not going to start teaching
>> people to use fan-out rather than [trigger].

> Therefore, in cases where crossed wires or other ambiguities are not an issue,
> Fanout(1) is preferable
> to Trigger(2).
>
> Conclusion: teach Fanout(1) and Trigger(2) for situations where ordering doesn't
> matter, and Trigger(1) for
> situations where it does. The end.

also, in a potential future with some kinds of parallelism in pd, taking Fanout 
(rather than Trigger) as an explicit statement that the branches are not 
dependent on order of execution is quite interesting, and very consistent with 
the ideal that Fanout order is undefined. But that is a dream-space a long way 
off for pd as it is now.

Simon




More information about the Pd-list mailing list