[PD] [change] bug?

Dan Wilcox danomatika at gmail.com
Tue Sep 24 16:16:02 CEST 2013

Ah but then if [change] used null by default, it wouldn't actually work by default ... that seems far worse then the reasonable default of 0.

On Sep 23, 2013, at 10:19 PM, pd-list-request at iem.at wrote:

> From: Mario Mey <mariomey at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [PD] [change] bug?
> Date: September 23, 2013 6:55:36 PM CDT
> Cc: pd-list <pd-list at iem.at>
> Well, if it is me... yes, I would like to have NULL as init value.

Dan Wilcox

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20130924/bbff74ba/attachment-0001.htm>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list