[PD] Legal restrictions for apps
danomatika at gmail.com
Sun Oct 6 02:53:44 CEST 2013
Awesome, thank you. I'm glad we could figure it out. I remember checking a few times and we discussed this in libpd. I kept getting confused by the different licenses.
On Oct 6, 2013, at 3:55 AM, Miller Puckette <msp at ucsd.edu> wrote:
> OK... done and pushed to git repo.
> On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 12:18:23PM -0700, Miller Puckette wrote:
>> Hmm... Looking back in the git repo i saw:
>> commit 42f3e5f8dbc60ad644e9f8a1c5b61d1847e19470
>> Author: Miller Puckette <msp at ucsd.edu>
>> Date: Thu Nov 3 11:40:35 2011 -0700
>> change expr~ source to LGPL license (with IRCAM"s permission :)
>> I had quite forgotten about this (and still can't remember this ever having happened)
>> but here's the e-mail I got from Shahrokh:
>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 02:50:53AM -0700, Shahrokh Yadegari wrote:
>>>> Dear Max and Miller,
>>>> I got news from IRCAM that they are willing to release expr code on LGPL.
>>>> Will that solve the current licensing problems?
>>>> Max, could you communicate to the list and let me know what they think
>>>> this. I hope this helps.
>> So I think we're in the clear (although I hope Shahrokh kept the mail from
>> IRCAM authorizing this!)
>> I'll go on and change the source over here so that it appears in the git repo.
>> (This will take some time as I first want to merge my 0.45 fixes into 'master'.)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list