[PD] headroom in Pd

peiman khosravi peimankhosravi at gmail.com
Sat Dec 21 14:58:28 CET 2013


However, it's probably wise to clip the signal before sending it to dac~.
Entirely for health and safety reasons!




*www.peimankhosravi.co.uk <http://www.peimankhosravi.co.uk> || RSS Feed
<http://peimankhosravi.co.uk/miscposts.rss> || Concert News
<http://spectralkimia.wordpress.com/>*


On 21 December 2013 13:48, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> wrote:

> On 2013-12-20 23:34, Martin Peach wrote:
> > On 2013-12-20 16:55, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> >> Hi there, where can I find info about headroom and clipping on Pd. Or
> >> can anyone tell me quickly how it goes?
> >>
> >> Does it always really clip over a maximum of 1, or is there some
> >> headroom? Does it depend on the audiocard or something?
> >
> > The soundcard will always clip above +1 and below -1, and sometimes even
>
> yes, but the output of Pd (what you send to [dac~]) is not necessarily
> sent directly to the soundcard: e.g when using jack, the samples will be
> passed as floating point values to the next client: so samples exceeding
> -1..+1 need not clip at all.
> you can confirm this by connecting the output of Pd to the input of Pd
> via jack, and send a [osc~ 440]*10 ...
>
> but when you connect this output to the system output, you will get
> clipping.
>
> afaik, you get something similar on OSX, where the (portaudio) API will
> take floating point samples, and the signal gets sent through a limiter
> to prevent obvious clipping.
>
> so the bottom line is: hardware always has a physical range limit (that
> is mapped to -1..+1).
> but Pd is software and some audio APIs can handle sample values in
> floating point format just fine. with these, you most likely don't get
> any *immediate* problems if the range exceeds -1..+1.
> however, how excessive samples are handled is highly depending on the
> audio API and eventually other components in the signal chain.
> so if you do want to output signals that are outside -1..+1, you are on
> your own (from Pd's perspective).
>
>
> > within those limits (if the interpolated waveform between samples goes
> > over the limit).
>
> well, the reconstruction filters in the DAC won't necessarily clip in
> this case.
>
>
> gfamdsr
> IOhannes
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20131221/ea4527b7/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list