[PD] GEM causes soung glitches

Antoine Villeret antoine.villeret at gmail.com
Sun Dec 29 01:16:05 CET 2013


hi Luiz,

I recently heard that for certain scenario Pd-extended is more CPU
expensive than the same in pure vanilla. (a friend of mine reported that on
RPi)
Maybe you could try to reduce the number of extended objects to the
strictly minimum.
It's worth it most of the time.

Best

Antoine

--
do it yourself
http://antoine.villeret.free.fr


2013/12/28 Luiz Naveda <lab.naveda at gmail.com>

> Iohannes,
>
> I am very sad to listen these words from you. I am just trying to point to
> a problem that I feel is important: making sound and work with gem causes
> glitches in several scenarios. It is a main problem for me and for some
> people I know.
>
> I accept that you think I am not a professional as you are and I also
> accept that I have all sort of design problems. No problem.
>
> But we have a problem here. I am just trying to wave the priority.
>
> I cant help solving the problem directly. My programming skills are not so
> good. But if you want I can do other tasks, try to raise money, I dont
> know. How do I start?
>
> I would like to ask you, in a very kind way and very friendly. Try not to
> reply posts like that suggesting that I am not professional or etc. It
> makes people afraid of contributing. Please, call me anything but let
> people express their opinions without being hit by emails like that. I am
> saying this waiving a white flag :-) Pleaaaase!
>
> All the best
>
> Luiz
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 8:49 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>wrote:
>
>> On 2013-12-28 02:56, Luiz Naveda wrote:
>> > This workaround doesn't solve the problem. When you have to deal with
>> > messages, debugs and all sort of problems in the communication of
>> instances
>> > it just start the wave of problems.
>>
>> most likely, you have a serious design problem.
>>
>>  For newbies working with simple patches
>> > it is a frustration. For people working professionally in complex
>> patches
>> >  it is a hell.
>>
>> then you do you have a serious design problem.
>>
>> >
>> > I think it is a annoying, important and bizarre problem for a software
>> > aimed at  multimedia computing. The last time I had to deal with this
>> > rarely documented problem made me consider switch to other platforms. I
>> > wish someone could make it a high priority request for the PD
>> developers.
>> >
>>
>>
>> the fact that it is a "rarely documented problem" makes me think that
>> the priority need not be as high as you suggest.
>>
>> in the meantime, raise the audio buffer of Pd.
>> (and get yourself a decent gfx card with some proprietary (shudder)
>> drivers).
>>
>> having said that, there is certainly loads of things to improve.
>>
>> since you seem to be "working professionally in complex" scenarios, i
>> would like to invite you to help solving the problem (in a way that
>> doesn't break everything platform X)
>>
>> fgmdsr
>> IOhannes
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Luiz Naveda
> _____________________________________________________
> - PhD researcher
> http://www.ipem.ugent.be/samba
> - Director SysMus09
> http://www.ipem.ugent.be/sysmus09
>
> IPEM - Institute for Psychoacoustics and Electronic Music
> Ghent University
> Office: + 32 9 264 4127
> Blandijnberg 2
> Ghent, B-9000
> Belgium
>
>                                       ^v^
>       ^v^
>                          ^v^
>
> ^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~~^~~^~~^~^~^~~~^^~^~~~~
> ^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~~^~~^~~^~^~^~~~^~~~
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20131229/f157e091/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list